World orders formulation to govern the world politics

In order to control international affairs, world orders are created. They strive for international peace and harmony. Parties working to create these world orders strive for a system of global administration that will address issues like insecurity and power imbalance on a global scale. Politicians like Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill have used the phrase “world order” following significant conflicts like World War 1, World War II, and the Gulf War. This article examines whether global orders are a practical means of resolving global issues.

The nation has made conscious, collective efforts to address global problems since the establishment of the world order. Organizations such as UN and NATO were formed, each with its own issues to address. They were formed to find ways of settling international disputes peacefully and ensure controlled use of weapons among other reasons. Using weapons of mass destruction is a problem with a global concern. Despite having world orders, countries like Korea have been producing nuclear weapons (Scheinman 86). Trying to force such a country to adhere to the world’s policies on weapons use and production may cause more global problems. There is a possibility of a nuclear war in future. This means that world orders are weak because not all countries comply.

World orders aim at a world governed by same principles and rules. This is practically impossible. The fact that nations are independent, and guided by the principles of autonomy, many states never comply. Most African countries have in recent times tried to withdraw from the Rome Statute that forms the International Criminal Court (ICC) (Dutton 7).

Clearly, world orders have little chances of success. They will never achieve their objectives and super power countries know that. They are simply used by super power countries to define how they relate to each other based on mistrust, suspicions, hidden deals, and conspiracies. Undeveloped countries feel oppressed by developed countries. Developed countries will continue doing their things secretly regardless of the world orders.

Question 2

In 1914 before the World War I the nations of the world had hopes of a united world. Nations believed in a world without armed conflict. There were hopes of interconnections among nations in business and trade. However, the World War 1 proved otherwise. The world order of 2017 aims at reforming the Security Council to include permanent members from the P5 nations to deal effectively with divisive world conflicts. The order aims at increasing the military so much to ensure that no country threatens world peace. These objectives of the new world order are hard to implement. It will just flop like the 1914 world order due to the following reasons (Kegley & Shannon 15).

World war III will come soon. The agreements on nuclear weapons are breaking. The Republic of Korea is manufacturing nuclear weapons. Countries such Iraq may have access to these weapons of Mass destruction. These would be the beginning of world war III. Just like 1914, after the war, countries will come together again to find a solution and try to fix the mess.

Advancement in technology has weakened the world order. There have been cyber wars and increased tensions especially after the election of Donald Trump as the American President in 2016. The world nations are no longer working together in sectors of security. Trump’s administration has new policies on migration. America is reducing its involvement in the world affairs in the new world order, most Americans who elected Donald Trump agree with him that they should deal with America first before solving issues of the other countries. This means that the world will not have a sole monopoly, rather there will be more strong countries that will determine how the world affairs are conducted.

Rebellious countries will orchestrate wars and conflict just because in the new world order, there are five countries that seem to have more powers over the others. For example, the war in Syria and Yemen may be as a result of rebellion and hatred. Some terrorist groups such as ISIS, AL Qaeda and Al Shabaab are used and funded by the rebelling countries. This makes it difficult to implement the new world order. It is evident that implementation of the world order is as difficult as it was in 1914. Nations of the world cannot work together in implementing global policies

Question 3

The existence of the new world order that was introduced in 2017 seems to be steering on the brink of the financial disaster. Consequently, the financial collapse tends to have had an effect on the western economy. It is noted that the January 2017 order had created a lot of exploding defects on the Americans inflation this situation probably was getting worse than the great depression. Among the major developed nations, the possible growth will probably be driven by the US economy. The growth is expected to be at 2.2% out of this growth; the euro zone is expected to expand at a higher of 1.5%. In addition, as much as there are concerns about the housing markets and some of the buildup depts. In china, the economy is forecast to grow by over 6%. The 2017, new order seemed to have challenged the world politically. Some of this discussion witch come with the new world order of 2017 include the Brexit discussions also, there are number of European elections that are scheduled this year’s which are likely to test the investors nerves (Smolenski & Humphrey 34).

All over the globe, the votes that are being conducted seem to be sending some of the clear messages to its respective governments. The message this time means that the people are not really happy and contented with the status quo. Most of this driven anger can be traced back to the weak recovery that was obtained in the aft math of the financial crisis. This was one of the slowest one ever to be recorded.

Some of the issues that have been widely covered in this particular order that make it more advanced and predictable include the following;

First the govern mintage supposed to start spending again. The Trump victory in the just concluded American elections could be just one of the game changer for the economic policy. The newly elected prescient has promised to cut down taxes, spend so much on rebuilding American gaining infrastructure, reduce regulations and create more jobs. As much as it could be so unclear how the said policies will be funded, some of the existing expansionary policies have the potential to extend and also to prolong the current economic cycle that was seen to be at risk of running out of steam. This aspect is likely to prompt significant change in some of the policy direction for of the other coming governments in the coming years.

The other issue that has been widely been addressed in the order I is the protecntionalism. This can be said to be amore worrying trend. Over the 30 years the issue of globalization has been considred as a positive force. It has helped many people in developing the nations to help them in existing poverty, however majority in the developed world have since failed to see the benefits and have since been feeling left behind.

Question 4

The first challenge that has been facing the development of the new order is the world policy. Most of the European countries are currently set to get into apolitical fray. Some of these include the Italian constitutional referendum and the election in France and Germany. Some of the policies that are being portrayed by some of the aspirants in this elections tend to be facing a lot of changed and are been questioned a lot by the other contestants in the race

The second, change is the fact that the world order has over the time failed to handle some of the problem that people are facing. As t portrayed by some of the scholars, the world order seemed to have fone lot harm a good. Most of the people are not able to enjoy the benefits that come with this new kind of orders because of the difficulties that comes with them. Thirdly, some of this world order is currently being rejected by some groups or states. Example has been profoundly seen in the European Union. Most of the states and group are today looking for what can work for the not what the world thinks can be suitable for them. Finally, the cost of enforcing this order is extreme high. Most of the state, therefore, are either unwilling or are actually unable to pay this kind of cost (Smolenski & Humphrey 75).

Question 5

From the discussion above, the conflicts facing the world requires a spreading determination of the people living on this planet to promote different agendas that will drive globalization and thus, shape the future of everyone on this earth. This determination should be seen as democratic in the broadest sense of the term. However, less effort has been achieved due to the continuing gap between unity and integration in the contemporary world. As a result, this has led to further tensions and conflicts in the process of governance. To bridge this gap and ensure that globalization is achieved to curb various issues facing the world, first, human beings require a sense of security and identity. Secondly, from their social context, people need both recognition and valued relationship. More so, individuals across the world should control over their environment to insure that their needs are fulfilled. This approach has a significant implication for social institutions. On the other hand, the necessary institutional structures have to evolve in order to accommodate the needs of the people effectively (Smolenski & Humphrey 89). If the needs are not met, the institutions loses support and legitimacy, hence increase in confronts. If particular social orders in an institution are only legitimized for a portion of society, it would be expected that those needs are not meet, the people would react negatively. Therefore, it is the duty of the different institutions to balance the needs of the people across the world.

Work Cited

Dutton, Y. M.. Enforcing the Rome Statute: Evidence of (Non) Compliance from Kenya. Ind. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 2016: 26, 7.

Kegley, Charles W, and Shannon L. Blanton. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2013. Print.

Scheinman, L. The international atomic energy agency and world nuclear order. Routledge. 2016.

Smolenski, John and Thomas J Humphrey. New World Orders. 1st ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013. Print.