The Sharpie’s Design Principles

According to the principle of irrelevant conclusion

One might make a decision to placate the audience even though the conclusion does not relate to the argument as stated by the speaker. Such hyperbole occurs when the outcome appears to establish one case but ultimately proves another. When the speakers try to persuade the audience on a solution to a certain problem, they frequently use the fallacy in their conversation. However, in such cases, the speaker’s logic tends to prove a distinct argument rather than the topic in question. In general, the fallacy serves to solve cases that people are likely not to buy the argument when they consider that the logics are false and can hardly materialize. They, therefore, rush to the conclusion that through keen look does not belong to the primary argument.

Speaking the truth in the society may be difficult

More as people rarely get convinced by the truth. Therefore, writers in different fields such as factual and scientific may fail to provide a clear explanation of their arguments. They, therefore, employ the Sharples’ principles such as irrelevant conclusion to convince the audience so that they would buy their arguments (Wang & Shen, 2012). However, should the writers try to speak the truth; the audience may reject the arguments when they find that they can hardly happen. Most of the scientific theories bases on certain assumptions that the average human beings cannot easily understand. However, the scientific writers have the responsibility of convincing the audience to accept the arguments. They, therefore, have to use the fallacies to enable their audience to take their messages.

Similarly, factual writers do face the same reality

Where they are aware of the truth that they should pass to the people. However, having an understanding of the reaction they would get from the public, they, therefore, employ the fallacies to give the message easily. Thus, people do choose the best methods of promoting understanding of their theories through applying false arguments. Despite knowing that the conclusion may be irrelevant to the arguments, they buy them to improve understanding. It works well as the writers achieve their goals through the use of fallacies. Therefore, the mistakes form important parts of communication as they ease the understanding between the authors and their audiences.

There are several design principles used in connection

To allow the agreement between the speakers and the fans. Although the principles are always aware that some of the methods provide a false argument, they cannot have any other choice but to use them to achieve their goals. They get bound by the principles to help them in communication despite knowing that they pass the wrong message. To avoid the fallacies, the writers should employ other means of communication that shall enable the audiences to buy their words. However, scientific an argument might appear, there must exist better ways of passing them to the audiences without use fallacies that only foolish them. Therefore, if the writers dissociate from the false principles, they can find better methods of communicating to their audiences and ensure that the fans understand the arguments. However, it would be wrong to pass false arguments knowingly to the audience. There is always an element of guilt that surrounds the speaker while giving the information to the public while aware that the message is false.

References

Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2012). Message design for mobile learning: Learning theories, human cognition and design principles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 561-575.