the oil pollution act

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 simplified and strengthened the EPA’s ability to prevent and respond to catastrophic oil leaks (Laws, 2012). A trust subsidy funded by an oil cost is available to clean spills where the responsible party is unable or unable to do so. The OPA needs oil storage tanks and vessels to apply designs to the federal government outlining how they can react to large releases. The OPA also calls for the development of Environmental Contingency Plans in order to prepare for and respond to oil spills on a regional scale.

The Clean Water Act

The Clean Water Act builds up the fundamental structure for directing releases of toxins into the waters of the United States and managing quality measures for surface waters (Laws, 2012). Under the CWA, EPA has actualized contamination control projects, for example, setting wastewater norms for the industry. The CWA made it unlawful to release any poison from a point source into traversable waters unless the permit was given.

Management of Digging or Fills Material

The government manages the release of digging or fills material into waters of the United States, which incorporate wetlands. This management requires a permit from the Corps given administrative rules created in conjunction with EPA. Inability to get permission or conform to the terms of a license can bring about common and additionally criminal punishments.

Protection of Wetland

Apart from the government’s involvement, the law also addresses protection of wetland. Under Section 404(c), the Administrator of the EPA may disallow or limit the utilization of any characterized territory as a transfer site, in the event that it is resolved that the release may cause inadmissible antagonistic impacts on city water supplies, untamed life, shellfish informal lodging zones, or recreational regions (Laws, 2012).

Limited Liability Partnership

Limited Liability Partnership. This form of establishment entails several partners in the business. Also, they protect themselves from liability. The protection from liability is described with particular details. Doctors, lawyers, and accountants prefer this form of partnership. In case one partner engages in malpractice, the rest will not be affected (Abbott, Pendlebury & Wardman, 2013). Nonetheless, the business liability is managed by all partners. In this particular case, the nature of the business is a pharmaceutical company called Getwell Limited. In all their brands, they accompany the product with a leaflet of information. This booklet guides patients on how to use the drug, its effects, and efficacy. In case a consumer gets any of the stated side effects, the company will not be liable.

Limited Liability Company

Limited Liability Company. This form of business protects the owners from liability. In case the firm gets into debt, the owners’ property will not be used to settle the debt (Abbott, Pendlebury & Wardman, 2013). Bright Light is a publishing house with limited liability. A particular book offers treatment and remedies, but it is not certified. The publisher has warned people from using it for diagnosis. It is just an informative material. In both examples, the businesses have managed to disclaim liability efficiently. Their products are accompanied with information warning and alerting users about critical issues. Getwell Limited has a leaflet that gives the details of the drug. The publishing house also warns people from possible misuse of the information in the book. They understand that readers may use it to diagnose themselves instead of going to the hospital. It is clear that consumers who do not abide by the cautions cannot blame the companies.

References

Abbott, K., Pendlebury, N., & Wardman, K. (2013). Business law. Andover: Cengage Learning.

Laws, E. A. (2012). Environmental Toxicology, Introduction. Environmental Toxicology, 1-15.