Top Special Offer! Check discount
Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!
The key question that the author addresses is concerning the racial preferences of color in archaeological research about the Americans. The author addresses this by drawing close references to the Kennewick and the Caucasian man.
The most important information in the text is concerning the discovery of the Caucasian skull and the existence of the Caucasian skull. The author makes an effort to provide a brief history of the Caucasians and talks about the Caucasian homecoming. The author uses the Caucasian homecoming to try to find out if the press provides the necessary information about just when we became human.
According to the author, most of the information provided as an origin account of the Caucasoid man is a myth or may be as a collective account of events from various people and communities. However, some of these myths and stories that are told about may be based on a fact/ event that took place.
One of the main assumptions underlying the author’s thinking concerns the information and accounts of events being mythological and relying on generated theories. Moreover, there is an assumption made that the Caucasoid extraction had toured the region 16000 years ago.
The main point of view presented is concerning the evolution of the Caucasoid man. The text continues and tries to give a brief account of the history of the Caucasian man and his relation to the Kennewick man.
The author overlooks the information provided about the origin of account of the Caucasian man and the archaeological efforts in the process of extraction, therefore, affecting his judgment terming it as a racial preference in skulls and bones.
Work Cited
Hitt, Jack. “Mighty white of you.”Gawande and Cohen 2006 (2005): 237-71.
Hire one of our experts to create a completely original paper even in 3 hours!