The Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

268 views 5 pages ~ 1182 words Print

The Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. is a variety store focused on providing value to its customers that operates at a one dollar pricing point. Controlled and profitable expansion is compatible with the company’s objective. The business was founded in Dalton, Georgia, in 1986. The company Dollar Tree belongs to the Discount Variety Industry. Chesapeake, Virginia serves as its current headquarters. In the United States, it had 3,219 stores by 2007, an increase from 2,914 the year before. The 99 Cent only, Family Dollar, and Dollar General stores are the company’s main rivals. This is due to the fact that companies in this sector, which is now increasing at 2.38%, compete on price rather than quality. In terms of the total revenue, the market share of Dollar Tree is about 19%.

Competitive analysis

In this particular industry, the “Five Forces Model” determines that the rivalry between the existing companies as well as the menace of substitute goods is very high. This is due to low consumer loyalty, which is associated with the undifferentiated goods. Today, similar goods are being produced at low elastic switching costs that augment the threat of the substitute goods. In reference to Tully (2015), the threat of new competitors, supplier bargaining power and customer bargaining power are all minute in this industry. This is because of the preexisting interactions that have to with suppliers while the bargaining power of suppliers and customers is low because of product undifferentiating.

Therefore, the company’s success factors include low cost distribution, tight cost control and economies of scale. As a result, to out bid other companies in the discount variety industry, Dollar Tree is trying to open new stores, selling perishable items and by acquiring already existing stores.

Financial Analysis

The financial analysis of Dollar Tree makes estimates of the firm’s capital structure, profitability and liquidity based on the financial statements, current and forecasted. This enables the firm to compare its growth against other companies. Financial statements in the company are used to forecast short, medium and long term goals. Through the analytical tool, BETA, the analysts then employ the ”Capital Asset Pricing Model” (CAPM) to estimate the firm’s equity and the cost of capital using the ”Weighted Average Cost of Capital” (WACC).

The company is quite liquid when comparing it to its competitors as well as to the industrial average. Its Quick Asset Ratio and Current Ratio exceed the industry’s average. This means that it is in a position to service its liabilities in comparison to the industry as a whole (Thomas, 2016). On the other hand, it’s Working Capital Turnover and Inventory Turnover is lower in comparison to the current industrial average. However, in terms of the net profit margin, operating profit margin, return on equity and return on assets, the company is way profitable compared to its competitors. The company’s forecast for 2016 was computed using financial analysis average and growth rates using the retained earnings, total equity, total assets and total liability.

According to the overall valuations, the stock price of the company is overvalued. This is because stakeholders base their selling and purchasing power in a firm’s stock price. Therefore, it is the forecaster’s job to ascertain whether the published stock price is undervalued, fair or overvalued using intrinsic valuation methods. They also employ ratios such as the trailing and forecast price-earning, dividend yield, price over EBITDA and price to book and others to evaluate Dollar Tree’s position in comparison to competitors in the industry.

Conversely, the ”Intrinsic Valuation Method” employed by Dollar Tree analysts use the residual income perpetuity, abnormal earning approach, residual income method, discounted free-cash-flow model and discounted dividend models to determine Dollar Tree’s stock market value. The free-cash-flow model is applied to determine whether the stock prices are under, fairly or overvalued in the stock market.

Technique analysis

The internal factor evaluation (IFE) matrix is the strategic tool that Dollar Tree employs for carrying out its internal audit. The firm uses IFE and EFE in analyzing its finance, IT, marketing, accounts, human resources and operations. Under the IFE, strength factors come first before weakness. This includes the company’s ratings, weight index and total weighted score. The EFE matrix is a strategic management tool that evaluates the current business conditions. It is an exemplary tool for visualizing, examining and prioritizing current threats and opportunities. Dollar Tree employ these method too even though it is similar to the IFE matrix in order to improve the company. This is through social, demographic, environmental cultural, economic, political, business legal and government factors.

According to Andersen (2016), the social, demographic, environmental and cultural factors include age, race, per-capita income, type and population number, gap between the poor and the rich, number of marriages, racial and ethnical minorities, housing, immigration, health care and education. On the other hand, the economic factors include the economic growth, inflation, stock market trends. Additional these include foreign exchange rates, investment and saving levels, import and export barriers, government spending, product life cycles, economies of scale, industry properties, among others. The political, business, government and legal factors involve globalization trends, communication technologies, protection rights, subsidies, taxation, international trade regulations and terrorism amid others.

The BCG Matrix

This model was founded on the ”Product Life Cycle Theory” that determines priorities in a product or business portfolio. Goodman (2017) noted that this theory enabled analysts to establish and implement long term goals in Dollar Tree. This was achieved through placing the company through the theories two dimensions, market growth and market share.

SWOT Analysis

Dollar Tree Strengths

Fundamental operational measure that is better than the competitors in the industry in terms of expenses and returns,

Strong reputation for quality and service,

Weakened industrial competition,

Motivated workforce, and

Growing population markets

Weaknesses

Pricing against the alternative channels of competition

Dependency on an individual format

Difficulty in managing cultural interactions.

Opportunities

Growth and expansion

Format innovation

Frequent shopper data

High private margins and brand building

Threats

Competitor-store expansion

Managing high gross margins against competitors

Managing global tendencies

Rising above other companies in global expansion

Managing the company’s expansion without compromising business units

Conclusion

In this industry, there are many companies coming up on top of the already existing ones. Therefore, to maintain an upper hand in the industry, Dollar Tree employs various strategies. Even though it holds the highest profit margin and marketing share in the industry, upholding this is not easy. Moreover, the expansion of the company requires intellectual, educated, emotionally intelligent and patient managers to ensure the complicated system functions well.

References

Andersen, T. J. (2016). The Routledge Companion to Strategic Risk Management. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2016). Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases, Global Edition. [Place of publication not identified]: Pearson.

Goodman, M. (2017). Creativity and Strategic Innovation Management : Directions for Future Value in Changing Times. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Parnell, J. (. (Alan). (2013). Strategic Management : Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Thomas, W. (2016). Essentials of Strategic Management : Effective Formulation and Execution of Strategy. Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschel.

Tully, S. (2015). HOW THE DOLLAR STORE WAR WAS WON. Fortune, 171(6), 88 -99.

March 02, 2023
Category:

Business

Subcategory:

Corporations Marketing

Subject area:

Company Value Customer

Number of pages

5

Number of words

1182

Downloads:

49

Writer #

Rate:

4.8

Expertise Customer
Verified writer

I enjoyed every bit of working with Krypto for three business tasks that I needed to complete. Zero plagiarism and great sources that are always fresh. My professor loves the job! Recommended if you need to keep things unique!

Hire Writer

Use this essay example as a template for assignments, a source of information, and to borrow arguments and ideas for your paper. Remember, it is publicly available to other students and search engines, so direct copying may result in plagiarism.

Eliminate the stress of research and writing!

Hire one of our experts to create a completely original paper even in 3 hours!

Hire a Pro

Similar Categories