The contradiction is very vivid in Harrison Bergeron

When the question of human dignity in 1960 is examined in Harrison Bergeron, the paradox becomes quite clear. Harrison believes that all were equal, and to further expand on equality, he claims that they were equal not only before God but also before the law. The amendments to articles 211, 212, and 213 of the constitution brought about this balance and ensured that no one was faster or better than the other. The individual dignity that comes from the legislation enacted by federal governments does guarantee equality. Human freedom remains a long way from democracy. Democracy ensures that there is no discrimination and the policies, pedagogies, and practices are all inclusive. It ensures that there is conformity, but it does not ensure equality. Equality is not possible in some areas like in beauty, strength and also intelligence and there is no time that people will be equal when it comes to natural status.
Question three
Thoreau claims to have heard several sounds example being the crowing of the cock, hooting of the owl and the clangor of a goose. But he happens to hear a certain sound coming from an Indian pheasant. He seems pleased by this sound and imagines of it being the most remarkable sound of any bird. He has certain remarks on the sound claiming that it comes from an animal which is ever healthy having lungs that are sound and whose spirit never flag.
’Sounds’ by Thoreau is an article that depicts various sounds from different objects and also animals. The main essence of this book is to represent or express the reality of nature from its full complexity and the people’s longing to connect with it. The sound that Thoreau is talking about is those from different things that surround us.
Thoreau views the railroad in two forms where he sees it as a destructive beast of nature. This is because during its construction most of the natural resources ought to be destructed. On the other hand, Thoreau has a different opinion of the railroad where he sees its positive side of enhancing transport. The train takes people to new places. The bigger picture that Thoreau is trying to show is the problems that human beings had created and caused (Vonnegut, p37).
The essence of Thoreau is indulging into a considerable anthropomorphizing so as to attribute capacities thought by people to show the difference between human and non-human agents in specific humanlike mental capacities.
Writing about a place is important for it creates remembrance. Places are marked as historical sites or important places as a result of what other wrote about the place. It is what was written about the place that brought about that landmark.
Having a relationship with a place means that you special attachment with the place. This means it you might have been born or even brought up there and making that places your home. Relationship of people with places changes with a place over time. The reason for this is because communities loose their memories along with their culture when there is any change. This affects the relationship with the place.
The places we inhabit tend to affect the way we view the rest of the world others and ourselves. People tend to be hanged on change, and whenever they visit a place, they always carry out a comparative analysis of the place they come from. This makes them rate themselves of being better or underdeveloped.
The places that we live intend to affect the way we communicate with each other due to the differences in our thinking. People from different settings tend to have different exposure making them the reason of things differently. This affects even communication.
Places, space, environment, landscape, country, and the culture have major connections in that they all depict the being of a place. The description of all these is based on certain characteristics that seem to be distinct.
Gender affects the way people view about a place. Women may happen to view a certain different from the way men will view a certain place. This is due to various cultural lines that make both men and women are different. Also, people from different ethnicities or culture will experience a certain place differently due to different beliefs (Cafaro, p35).
Question four
Nicks happens to be suffering emotionally
Nick is a victim of war with lots of suffering. At the beginning of the story, we see Nick going back to his roots only to find a burnt town and just foundations stuck up above the ground. He moves around the burned countryside without any particular destination as he moves by the river bed.
Nick enjoys being around earth’s nature away from a life of hustle and tussle in the struggle to remain alive. Upon his return from the war, Nick is emotionally unwell after coming from war and finding no place to call home causing him to sleep out in the woods.
His suffering is mainly depicted in the story as Nick first has to come up with a tent so as not to spend more nights in the dark. He has had to travel for long without eating and by the time he is through with the tent he is hungrier than ever.
After being through a life full of war events, Nick finally comes to a conclusion to settle upstream by the riverside and start fishing. This may be a measure taken into account by Nick to help him overcome painful and tormenting events in his life from the war. Maybe Nick’s life would have been far much greater than he was if he had been not recruited in the world war. Further to this, back then in the war, Nick’s friend Hopkins would accompany him on his yacht to go out fishing in the Black River a long time ago. This also explains Nick’s fishing love and why he found himself comfortable always being alongside the river.
Nick’s story has been divided into two parts. Part one of the story is supposed to take the leader through Nick’s struggle and suffering into life and also to highlight little about his past. The second part of the story shows Nick transforming himself to fishing. Nick is a lover of nature. It is seen that when around earth’s nature Nick is more anxious and likes being on his own most of the times. Nick’s anxiety over nature can be seen when he goes out in the morning to catch grasshoppers. This just shows how much Nick has a special loving to nature and it is all that his life depends on to continue living after the hard hit effects of the war. Nature according to nick’s life is whatever around him that supplements his living which includes the river, trees, and living creatures. He considers the burnt town as part of his past life which he intends to keep away from for it brought him nothing else than pain and loneliness after losing his normal life and even some of his friends.

Read also: Where to find the best write my essay platform?

Work Cited

Vonnegut, Kurt. harrison Bergeron. Mercury Press, 1961.
Cafaro, Philip. “Thoreau’s Environmental Ethics in Walden.” The Concord Saunterer 10 (2002): 17-63.