natural energy cause and effect

Natural Energy: A Clean and Efficient Fossil Fuel

Natural oil is regarded as the best fossil fuel for a wide range of applications, including construction and power generation. This is because of its comparatively low delivered quality, relative cleanliness, and productivity. In contrast to coal and oil, this commodity has been described as a good contender for energy supplies (Chong et al. 1). For several years, natural energy has been a clear and wise alternative. Furthermore, this energy is thought to be the cleanest burning fossil fuel. As a result, environmentalists support it, and it is favored over other sources. Natural energy has many advantages that stretch beyond a millennium. In transportation, manufacturing, and heating, physical energy is an environmentally friendly substitute for other fossil fuel. This paper will evaluate the relationship between the causes and effect of natural energy.

Causes for Natural Energy

There are numerous reasons for the application of natural energy. First, besides being a richly existing power source, the natural gases are as well applied in combination with an innovative and growing renewable industry. This, in turn, meets an agreed ambition for a reduction in a manner that is economically superior. The natural energy is as well for numerous functions beyond power. This includes using them in commercial and residential context for cooking and heating, as fuel for transportation, and in industrial application. Another cause is that the natural energy has the potential to play a significant function in the evolution to a cleaner energy future as a consequence of its content, which is high in energy. This leads to lower emissions of volatile organic compounds at combustion and carbon, relative to oil and coal. These characteristics of the natural energy present considerable environmental benefits such as reduced emission of CO2, as well as improved air quality. The conventional energy sources based on the natural gas has demonstrated to be economic progress drivers that are highly effective (Ellabban, Abu-Rub, and Blaabjerg 749).

An additional cause is that the natural energy is the only fuel that is anticipated to grow due to its share of the primary energy mix. Furthermore, the trade in the physical energy has a vital role in the value chain since the supply of the product is time and again not in the same location as the demand. Another cause is that the commercial trade of the natural energy has increased in application and significance in recent years. The abundant supply of the natural energy globally has spurred the growth of demand internationally. In various regions, the natural energy will keep on taking share in the building, industrial, and generation building. Another source of natural energy is the nuclear power since uranium, which is its primary fuel is found in rocks in the ground (Cheshire 24).

Effects of Natural Energy

There is no escaping the energy development even for diversity. Despite being considered to be clean energy sources, the natural energy also has some impact on the natural landscape they are established. Ideally, the product has lower emissions of global warming emissions from its combustion when compared to natural gas. Nonetheless, the transportation of the natural gases and its extraction, as well as drilling from the wells, may lead to the leakage of methane. In essence, this is an element of the natural gas that is 86 times stronger than CO2 for over 20 years and 34 times more active in shutting in heat over a period of 100 years. The air emissions are generated from many by-products streams (Fowler 87).

Additionally, although the natural energy has a cleaner burning when compared to other fossil fuel, its combustion produces negligible amounts of particulates, mercury, and sulphur. What’s more, during combustion, these gases generate nitrogen oxide, which is a herald to smog, although this occurs at rates that are lower than the use of diesel and gasoline for motor vehicles. Despite its various advantages, the development of the natural energy can influence the regional as well as local air quality. In different regions where the drilling takes place, there have been increases in the concentrations of air pollutants that are hazardous. These pollutants can cause adverse health outcomes such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory systems when exposed to high intensity. The primary concern of the environment is the exploitation of the natural energy, which may result in uncontrolled gas leakages (Chong et al. 14).

The land disturbances and construction that is needed when for drilling the natural gases such as gas and oil can harm the local ecosystems and alter land use. This is because the process fragments migration patterns, the wildlife habitats, and cause erosion. The process of construction leads to the erosion of minerals, dirt, and other pollutants that are harmful into the nearby streams. Furthermore, the development of the natural energy may contaminate the drinking water sources of the nearby communities, thereby posing health risks. In this case, the underground gases and the naturally occurring radioactive materials may leak into the supplies of the drinking water; hence, pose health effects. The development of the natural energy is expanding rapidly on a global scale, and it raises environmental health concerns (Werner 1).

Conclusion

The demand for the physical energy has remained steady. The product has continually taken share in the building, industrial, as well as general use. The consumption of the natural energy will increase as the growth in population continues to drive growth in demand for the expected energy. This is because the product has been categorized a strong candidate for energy resources compared to coal and oil (Chong et al. 1).

Works Cited

Cheshire, Gerard. Energy. London, Evans, 2006.

Chong, Zheng Rong, et al. “Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges.” Applied Energy 162 (2016): 1633-1652.

Ellabban, Omar, Haitham Abu-Rub, and Frede Blaabjerg. “Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39 (2014): 748-764.

Fowler, Bruce A., ed. Biological and environmental effects of arsenic. Vol. 6. Elsevier, 2013.

Werner, Angela K., et al. “Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: a review of the current strength of evidence.” Science of the Total Environment 505 (2015): 1127-1141.