Kidney sale current situation

Kidney sales have been a prominent emphasis in the current global market environment. This has a bearing on the current market condition, in which there has been a fall and decrease in the number of kidneys available for transplantation. As donors assist those who wish to be transplanted with kidneys, this has become a business. The donors have benefited financially from the selling of their kidneys, which has allowed them to pay off debts and improve their living conditions. In the world market, the donation of the kidneys for is a current business demand that has gotten popularity from the decrease of the kidney organs in the social life (Halloran, 2004). The demand of the kidney is very high in the current situation, especially in India.

In the most countries, the motion about kidney donation has been introduced. In most of the states, they agree that the living kidney donation should be agreed by the government and the transplanting community so that the rising demand in the organ demand could be achieved and neutralized. In most of the countries, they recommend living kidney donation than the dead kidney arguing that they are the main source of the living among those who are in need of them. Most physicians have agreed that kidney donation is not worthy of the health of the human but will always continue to lose and disorient the health of the individual for the rest of the time. Although many agree that it is not healthful to donate the kidney, the increased demand in the industry creates pressure to trigger this business as legal and to be implemented by the government to be carried out openly and the transplanting community to directly be involved in the process (Matas, 2004).

Kidney sale supply and demand model

In the most of the countries, there has been a very high death rate of the individuals who waits for a new kidney. The coursework focuses in the United States where the report by the world health organization shows that more than seven dollars Americans died last year as they were waiting for the kidney transplant. It has been noticed that due to the high difference in the demand and the supply of the kidney in the world, there has been a lot of death not only in the America but also in the other countries (Parikh, 2006). This demand has given rise to purchasing and paying off the kidney donors, and therefore the demand has to increase to meet the increasing demand in the world.

From the personal knowledge and perspective, in every country, the government need to put into consideration the need to introduce the specific places of donations. As a result of many death of people in the hospitals waiting to be transplanted with the kidney, transplanting community need to come together and agree with the government on what restrictions and the condition need to be there. It could be wise for the government in every state to agree and provide incentives and some other benefits to lower the costs of these organs. This is as a result of the many people who are not capable of affording such organs (Radcliffe‐Richards, 2015). It could be of no benefit if more people could be still dying in the hospitals when they cannot afford them.

This is where the government needs to intervene so that all the people who are capable and not capable of affording the kidneys could have the same measure. It has been a global problem that is affecting all the states and therefore there is a need of the states to coordinate and work with the world health organizations to advertise for the more individuals who are willing to donate so at a considerable amount of money so that even the donors could benefit from the support they give their recipients.

For those who are fixed with these kidneys pay a lot of money and therefore the donors are the victims who are not benefiting from the occasion (Richards, Nephrarious goings on: kidney sales and moral arguments, 1996). If there could be sharing the cost between the recipients and the donors, then there could be decreased death rates from the event of many people donating to earn and benefiting the recipient in the beds waiting to be fixed with those kidneys

Ban or partial ban consequence

The banning of kidneys in the world market entails the essence of putting some restrictions on the donation of the kidneys. In the world, the demand for the donation is higher than the donation and therefore many people lack kidneys. For instance, if a state considers kidney sale an illegal business then there will be many people in the hospitals who are waiting for the kidney and organ donation (Starzl, 1989). These people will die due to the failure of system functioning as a result of the partial or total ban on organ donation.

In most of the countries like in India, there are many people who have specialized in providing and selling of the kidneys. In case of a ban in these state kidney ban, there could be many people slaking without jobs. There are mechanisms that the government set to tax every good that is locally produced within the country. The country will economically suffer from reduced tax from this business. Also, in those countries, there are these people who earn as they donate their organs. It means in case of a state ban on this kidney sale there will be many people who will suffer as a result of the loss of revenue toward reduced quality of living standards.

This aspect of the ban is not only affecting the restriction or the declaration of the government towards illegality of a particular transaction but also encompasses the aspect by the government introducing some unfavorable terms toward the donation that might in either way discourage of a drawback the expectations of the donors and the recipients. There some period of the lifetime especially when there is an outbreak of some contagious diseases in the land, and the government could announce that they suspense organ donation for a certain period could be a possibility of a partial ban of the same which could relevantly affect the life of the people who are in need of these organs.

Economist need for the market of kidneys

In every state with an ongoing business, the government earns through the taxes that are levied toward the sale of the commodities. Economist is the senior people who look at the economic growth of a certain state to have the clear truth of the business that is beneficial and the once that have a significant effect to the economy. These analysts have a significant move to judging the economy growth. The economist in India has considered the organ donation as one of the most significant factors leading to the economic growth. The donation in the current world is slagging, and the India is considering it as the base to the economic growth, there they encourage that the contribution is provided with the market where there will be an open field in the donation (Radcliffe‐Richards, 2015). This perspective by the government if implemented could lead to the growth of the economy.

Economist is not considering the other health effects with the service but focuses on the growth of the economy. Moreover, in India, there have been many people who have been earning from the fact of organ donation, and therefore economist considers the business worthy of the sustaining of the people. It has improved the standards of living for many people in India and even has enabled many people to repay the loans and debt using organ donation. In India, the economists encourage that we have the business running for the economy to continuously grow and the per capita income of the country to continuously improve (Halloran, 2004).

Kidney sale economic debate

In the most states have held motions to discuss the organ selling. There have been issues with the selling of the organs. The economist has taken a chance to analyze the effects of the organ selling within the market of the world. It has been a threat to the world market that there could be a creation of the economic war in the market. This is as a result of many people equating the class that they already have. The presence of auction in the back doors in every business has created a challenge toward economic war in the world market. There are some people who argue that the issues of the organs donations should be banned. They insist that the government should be involved in the restriction of the organ donation and kill the demand and the market for this business (Matas, 2004). Most of them argue that in the modern world there have been many cases of crime in the

Due to the demand and the available market for the human organs.

They have been supported by many proves that in the current affairs there have been many individuals who have lost in their ways and other lost in the hospitals due to demand for the organs. It is believed that those cases have been reported due to the demand of the organ market where people take advantage over the others and kidnap them and eventually they have robbed their organs and later sold in the market (Radcliffe‐Richards, 2015). It is an opportunity that is creating doubt in the security and the affairs of the humankind.

All the economist they have to think of the market for the kidney sales so that they could witness the economy as it grows. According to the economic state of different states, the economist will have to think of the continuation and diversion of the market to create room for the further development and increase of the economic status of a country.

Supply and economic demand

In this context of the academic writing, we are defining the demand and supply in a different situations. For example, talking of the demand and supply, we are referring to the number of the donations which have accepted to donate organs in the target of helping or for the monetary value. Demand in the context is very disappointing. It is referring to the number of the patients in the dying bed who are waiting to receive the organs. This demands in the context are greater than the supply meaning that people who are in need to be provided with the organs are many than the people who are willing to donate their organs (Halloran, 2004).

We can also see the effect with the consequence if there could be no market for the goods. The good that is in the question in this context is the kidneys that have been donated. If people could be willing to donate are many than the people who are in need of the organ, and it could not make to become a business (Starzl, 1989). In all when the demand is less with the supply exceeding the demand then the transaction that will be made might not be helpful to the economy and the state in general. Such a business cannot be allocated to be run within the state.

In such a case where the surplus is more and there is no market for the goods then the excess cannot be accounted for. In this case, we are talking about the human life. When there are no people in the bed the means that most of the people are better of the health. This is such challenging because the loss of demand means a better social health but the economist complaint that the economy of the state is low. It means that for the demand of the organs to ben high there should be more patients in the hospitals so that the demand of the people who are complaining of the organs are high. At the same time, the same government is putting a lot of effort to improve the social amenities and reduce the mortality rate of the people. The two cannot work. Therefore we can recommend the government to put a lot effort in improving amenities that will cater to people’s life.

The market for the context is the key t since it explains the demand that in the world market for the body organs. In the essence of the whole context, the main theme is the economic benefit and the of the kidney sales in the world market. It has been a treading issue that has caused the majority of the individuals within the country to grow rich as a result of their organ sale (Starzl, 1989). They have increased their living standards together with building the overall economy of the country.

References

Halloran, P. F. (2004). Immunosuppressive drugs for kidney transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine, 2715-2729.

Matas, A. J. (2004). The case for living kidney sales: rationale, objections and concerns. American journal of transplantation, 2007-2017.

Parikh, C. R. (2006). Urine NGAL and IL‐18 are predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function following kidney transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation, 1639-1698.

Radcliffe‐Richards, J. D. (2015). The case for allowing kidney sales. Bioethics. An Anthology, 40, 421.

Richards, J. R. (1996). Nephrarious goings on: kidney sales and moral arguments. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 375-416.

Richards, J. R. (2003). Commentary. An ethical market in human organs. Journal of medical ethics, 139-140.

Starzl, T. F. (1989). FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation. The Lancet, 1000-1004.