Justice Meaning Essay

According to me, justice is the philosophical or legal doctrine that governs the application of fairness. But how each society views and understands justice varies widely. Most of the time, cultures rely on their common mythology, history, and religion. (Baba, 2007). Each culture’s ethics produces ideals that have an impact on how people view justice. (Burke, 2013). Even though there may be some universally accepted concepts of justice, there aren’t enough of them to give rise to a common understanding of justice.

According to the egalitarian, justice only lives within the confines of equality. In essence, this viewpoint can be elaborated in numerous ways. (Taxman & Cropsey, 2007). Some of these views include the way things such as goods, respect, opportunity, and wealth are to be distributed (Burke, 2013). Another factor to be taken into being consideration include the what or who are to be distributed equally among the families, races, individuals, species, and nations. Typically, the egalitarian theories appear less concerned when it comes to the discussions about who exactly does the distributing (Helms, 2006). Moreover, it is also less concerned with the effects that the recommended policies are likely to have on the production of services, resources, or goods that they wish to distribute.

The egalitarian positions that are commonly held include the demands for the opportunity’s equality, even though in most cases, the nonegalitarian’s adherents of Justice defends the justice’s conceptions as well (Taxman & Cropsey, 2007). Notably, some of the egalitarianism variants affirm the equality itself acts as the highest justice. Again, justice must have equality unless it is hollow. However, such a formulation can only have a concrete meaning provided the principal terms have been fleshed out. According to Baba (2007), there has been a development of just theories at a cultural level in acceptance and sophistication during the past twenty decades. Socialism, progressivism, and left-libertarianism are some of the notable widely philosophies of egalitarian (Burke, 2013). In practice, they propound economic, legal, and political egalitarianism respectively.

Fairness

One form of fairness is the distributive justice, an equal goods distribution (Burke, 2013). In this case, economic and social inequalities are to be arranged to make them both attach to positions and offices that are open on the fair equality of opportunity’s conditions. Additionally, both the economic and the social inequalities must also act as the least advantage’s greatest benefits that is consistent with the principles of savings (Taxman & Cropsey, 2007). In the same way, each of the people is to have an equal right to the equal basic liberties most extensive total system with the freedom’s similar system for all (Helms, 2006). Since everyone would agree to such principles in a fair procedure of decision, they distinguish all kind of goods.

The distributive justice theory, in one sense, may assert that every individual has to get the things they deserve. However, theories cannot agree on what they deserve (Taxman & Cropsey, 2007). Concerning the meritocratic theories, there should be a distribution of goods such as social status and wealth to match the merit of individuals (Helms, 2006). Usually, the value of individuals has understood the combination of hard work and talent. Needs-based theories, on the other hand, argues that there should be a distribution of basic goods, especially shelter, food, and medical care to meet the basic needs of individuals (Baba, 2007). On some readings of the slogan of Marx, the Marxism is taken into consideration as the needs-based theory. Moreover, there should be a distribution of goods to match the contribution of individuals to the overall social good according to the contribution-based theory.

Criminal Justice System

By definition, the criminal system of justice involves the institutions and practices of government that are directed to uphold deterring, social control, and mitigating crime (Burke, 2013). Moreover, it can also be helpful to sanction the people who violate laws with rehabilitation efforts and criminal penalties. The individuals accused of the crime are protected against abuse of prosecution and inventory powers (Taxman & Cropsey, 2007). In some countries, the Commission advocates for a system approach to criminal justice. In turn, the system helps in improving coordination among courts, correctional agencies, and law enforcement. Baba (2007), notes that the commission of President defines the system of criminal justice as the means for society for implementation of the conduct’s standards that are necessary for protecting the community and the individuals.

In most countries, the criminal justice system aims at reducing crime by bringing several offenses to justice. In effect, they raise the confidence of the public that such a system is fair and will also work hard towards delivering for the law-abiding citizen (Baba, 2007). In this case, it aims at balancing the goals of preventing and controlling crime, and the fairness, equity, and the protection of the rights of the individuals (Helms, 2006). The overreaching goal of the justice system of criminal can also play a vital role throughout the entire society in any place.

Policing

Usually, the defendant has the first contact with the law enforcement or the police before facing the criminal justice systems. The police help with the investigations of any wrongdoing and in turn make an arrest of the suspect (Helms, 2006). However, a law enforcement agency’s national level is called in provided the suspect is dangerous to the entire nation (Taxman & Cropsey, 2007). When warranted, the police officers or the law enforcement agencies are empowered to use other forms of legal coercion including force and means to effect social and public order (Baba, 2007). Mostly, the term is associated with the departments of police of the state that have the authority for exercising the power of police of that state within a defined sectional or legal area of responsibility.

Conclusion

In summary, Justice may be used to mean a lot. Often, it is a complex and subjective term since it can easily be applied to various issues and area, both within and outside the justice system. In a world where people disagree even though they are interconnected, ideals for justice have to be initiated by the relevant institutions. In fact, the approximate instantiation may be used for justifying such institutions of justice. When compared with the ideal standards, they may be profoundly unjust taking into consideration the institution of slavery. In summary, the world is failing to live up to the idealness of justice, perhaps because of the deliberate resistance to justice notwithstanding the understanding that in some cases can be disastrous. Naturally, the institutive justice’s questions raise some of the issues of procedure, legitimacy, interpretation, and modification which are philosophers of and legal theorists considers.

References

Baba, Y. (2007). Book Review: In the Adopted Land: Abused Immigrant Women and the Criminal Justice System. Criminal Justice Review, 32(1), 82-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734016806297490

Burke, R. (2013). Theorizing the Criminal Justice System: Four Models of Criminal Justice Development. Criminal Justice Review, 38(3), 277-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734016812473822

Helms, R. (2006). Book Review: Criminal Justice in America: The Politics Behind the System. Criminal Justice Review, 31(4), 379-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734016806295592

Taxman, F., & Cropsey, K. (2007). Women and the Criminal Justice System. Women & Criminal Justice, 17(2-3), 5-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j012v17n02_02