Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

Heuristics is an excellent rule of thumb to follow while making judgments. It entails decision-making shortcuts that do not need much effort. Previous experiences can play a role. Using the wrong heuristics, or even any heuristics, can, however, overwhelm our ability to generate accurate forecasts. Heuristics has an impact on investor behavior since it suggests that some mutual funds have near-term, consistent good performance. Investors are motivated, and they react to current results rather than waiting for the outcome. This paper investigates the impact of heuristics and psychological biases on investor behavior. Decision making is important in every one’s life, moreover the main psychological aspect is availability this affects decision making. This is because people or in this case investors estimate things at ease and information that is opposed to processing all important information. Before making decisions, investors should estimate how the deal will be with the stock. Lately decisions made by firms and investors have been put under keen scrutiny due to the fact that the aspect of overconfidence has been a major influence.

Availability effects are still important even after being controlled due to various factors that include excess stock income, market capitalism and changes of numbers of categories in the revision. The process of decision making looks for things that will be taken to account if problematic and a solution for solving the problem is processed. Conferring to the availability heuristic proceedings that are meant to matter to the mind are easily believed and have a better chance of happening, while the reality comes when the act can be influenced by other factors. Heuristics is a good aspect of saving time and making decisions. The financiers always overinvest locally and domestically as this can be referred to as home bias whereby one invests on the brand.

The behavioral clarifications of financial verdicts were basically in the jurisdictions of choices established by investors. More emphasis has been put to sub-optimal verdicts undertaken by enterprise managers to whom boldness influences the decisions of these people. It results to possible mistakes in the capital budgeting process potentially caused by cognitive and emotional forces. This makes managers no different from other people in terms of their overconfidence.

Behavioral flaws impact the capital budgeting decisions. There is a consideration on the wide spread use of (patently inferior) payback as a project selection technique, the tendency to throw good money after bad and the tendency to permit inappropriate evidence to impact development implementation. About Rogue trader, Nick Leeson in 1993, made 10m pounds -10% of the banks’ profits for that year. But in 1995, the discovery of secret life showed that he got away with 827million pounds in barring’s name. Leeson went away scot-free. He arrived in Changi airport and was accompanied by security as he was charged with fraud and forgery and the act of the barrings collapse.

Due to loss abhorrence people will take steps to avoid “booking” a loss. Executives are no diverse. Evidence is there in that slightly negative earnings announcements are rare. Observation is a mutual place for an evidence handling ideal to assume that negotiators are able to obtain and collect costless evidence without misfortune. It can perhaps be misleading in an egoistic manner. The widespread standpoint that past encounters have in some way been scripted to the brain are then recovered. It is a way that can be experimental on people who come across an incident and takes ambiguous evidence about it this dishonesty is often unified into their service.

Decisions are required to be ready, even if the atmosphere is one of limited consideration, data and processing magnitude, so shortcuts or heuristics are necessary. An empirical is a choice instruction that abuses a detachment of the information established. Enron is a natural gas company that is based in Omaha, that later was rebranded into an energy trader. In 2000 Enron stated to crumble and CEO Jeffrey Skilling had hidden financial losses of the trading business.it failed and affected the lives of people and declared bankruptcy on December 2001.

The act to market practice led to schemes that were meant to hide losses and make the firm appear competitive and more profitable than before. To keep up with the downfall, an emerging star Andrew Fastow came up with a plan to help the company appear in good form despite its flaws of losing capital. The act was to use off balance sheet that were vehicles for special purposes to hide debt. Articles argue that investors who are keen on investing have an effect by the public attention plus they tend to go for the things that have certainly caught their attention. So this concludes that investors and analysts when choosing an informative event or a valuable indicator, this act comes by due to the act of limited attention and a dilemma of stocks.

The issue on the cooperative bank that the demonetisation case which will allow the bank to deposit old currency notes subject to conditions, it was stated that no transactions could take place, the bank had been banned from transacting due to this customers have to go to other banks as cooperative bank is losing its customers to other banks. Predisposition towards the home-country glides in the face of substantiation showing that diversifying transnationally enables investors to moderate the threat devoid of surrendering return. The rationale as to why the investors hold more securities is due to the fact that they are hopeful concerning their markets in relation to foreign markets. Banking crisis are triggered if the bank faces liabilities that come and doesn’t have enough cash or assets. They tend to affect economies badly and can also spread to other countries. Issues on credit risks, withdraws that exceed the funds available and the rising interest rates reduce the value of bonds in the bank.

Conclusion

In conclusion, financial behaviors stemming from representatives is evident that representativeness and related biases induce inappropriate investment decisions. It seems obvious that if a company has high quality management, a robust image and steady progress in earnings, it should be a good investment. Being a financial student I am aware that impending cash flows are estimated and discounted back to the present utilizing a suitable risk adjusted discount rate. Financiers may embrace retreats because they are bombastic about their labor in the arcade reasonably to the act of foreign markets. There is an argument that investors drift away on hearing or broadcasting overseas investments because of the feeling that it will become weak because of the fact that people tend to invest locally. Local market is home based and the act of having information advantages due to being geographically close may serve as an improvement.

Reference List

Ackert, L and Deaves, R 2009, Behavioral finance: Psychology, decision-making, and markets, Cengage Learning.

Bingham, C and Eisenhardt, K 2011, Rational heuristics: the ’simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience, Strategic Management Journal, 32(13): pp.1437-1464.

Benartzi, S and Thaler, R 2007, Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior, The journal of economic perspectives, 21(3): pp.81-104.

Bollen, N 2007, Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(03): pp.683-708.

Barberis, N and Thaler, R 2003, A survey of behavioral finance, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1: pp.1053-1128.

Barber, B., Odean, T and Zheng, L 2000, The behavior of mutual fund investors, Unpublished working paper.

Baker, H and Nofsinger, J 2010, Behavioral finance: investors, corporations, and markets, (Vol. 6). John Wiley & Sons.

Chen, M, Kim, K, Nofsinger, J and Rui, O 2004, Behavior and performance of emerging market investors: Evidence from China, unpublished Washington State University Working paper (January).

Hutchinson, J and Gigerenzer, G 2005, Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioral biologists might meet, Behavioral processes, 69(2): pp.97- 124.

Johnson, J and Tellis, G 2005, Blowing bubbles: Heuristics and biases in the run-up of stock prices, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4): pp.486-503.

King, J., Sueur, C., Huchard, E and Cowlishaw, G 2011, A rule-of-thumb based on social affiliation explains collective movements in desert baboons, Animal Behaviour, 82(6): pp.1337-1345.

Kliger, D and Kudryavtsev, A 2010, The availability heuristic and investors’ reaction to company-specific events, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(1): pp.50-65.

Lucey, B and Dowling, M 2005, The role of feelings in investor decision‐making, Journal of economic surveys, 19(2): pp.211-237.

Malmborg, C 2001, Rule of thumb heuristics for configuring storage racks in automated storage and retrieval systems design, International Journal of Production Research, 39(3): pp.511-527.

Singh, S 2012, Investor irrationality and self-defeating behavior: Insights from behavioral finance, Journal of Global Business Management, 8(1): p.116.

Shefrin, H 2002, Beyond greed and fear: Understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing, Oxford University Press on Demand.

Tennant, E., Lee, D., Zandian, M., Piquette, E and Carmody, M 2008, MBE HgCdTe technology: a very general solution to IR detection, described by “Rule 07”, a very convenient heuristic, Journal of Electronic Materials, 37(9): pp.1406-1410.

Tversky, A and Kahneman, D 1975, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In Utility, probability, and human decision making: (pp. 141-162). Springer Netherlands.

Turner, A 2009, The Turner Review: A regulatory response to the global banking crisis (Vol. 7). London: Financial Services Authority.