Influential civil rights Essay

Introduction

People who have supported the implementation, the defense of political sovereignty, and the growth of individual civil rights and liberties are considered influential civil rights figures. They care about preventing individuals and various groups from being subjected to political repression and discrimination on the part of ruling governments or private organizations. All members of society are guaranteed to participate in the political and civic life of the state through the activism process. Civic rights include the right to equitable treatment and protection, as well as the freedoms of speech, association, movement, and worship, as well as the right to vote and the dissemination of ideas and views through the media. This paper is set to discuss about Justice Antonio Scalia who is one of the most influential civil rights figures who was an extraordinary person and a jurist who is still relevant in the present century.

Justice Antonio Scalia’s Campaign for Gay Rights

Justice Antonio Scalia campaigned for the civil rights of those people that are engaged in gay marriages in the society. In 2003, Texas, Justice Antonio abetted in eliminating the jurisdictional imposition of homosexual matrimony as individual acts in the Supreme Court (Harcourt, 2004). He campaigned for the gay marriages when two people had been taken into custody and convicted for an act of homosexuality or rather sodomy which was against the law in Texas. This made him differ with several judges in the court since he also objected the court’s verdict on reconsidering bowers by asserting that there had been several ensuing decisions being made by the lower court hence leading to high prospects of the doubt.

Justice Antonio Scalia’s Contribution to Gay Rights

The society remembers Justice Antonio Scalia for his legal comprehension of marriage and the perspicacity of not outlawing gay marriage and the act of homosexuality as an individual act in the United States. He is seen as a champion of the gay rights since he committed himself to ensuring that the gay people in the society are not being oppressed or rather discriminated by other people as well as the law that had been put in place (Harcourt, 2004). In addition, Justice Antonio Scalia is also being remembered for his campaign for ensuring that same sex marriage, prostitution, masturbation, adult incest, bestiality, obscenity, and adultery has been legalized in the Constitution. He argued out that all these have to be legalized since it was centered on individual ethical choices.

Impact of Justice Antonio Scalia’s Work

In the modern era, the gay people have the rights to express their selves and the freedom of engaging in the political and the civic life of the state without being discriminated. Through Justice Antonio Scalia’s struggle for the rights of the gay in 2003, the gay people can live in peace without being discriminated. Moreover, he is also remembered as one of the most influential justices of the present century from the mid-20th century. Justice Antonio was a champion of originalism, the hypothesis of Constitution translation that tries to apply the comprehension of the individuals who drafted and approved the Constitution.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, through the struggles of Justice Antonio Scalia, the people that practice same-sex marriage enjoy the same rights as any other citizen in the state. There is less discrimination towards same-sex marriage in the state because Justice Antonio Scalia fought for their rights with the belief that their decisions or rather the choices that they make are based on ethical capacity. He remains to be remembered for his legal conception of marriage and the discernment of not interdicting gay marriage and the act of homosexuality as an individual act in the United States.

Reference

Harcourt, B. E. (2004). Foreword:“ You Are Entering a Gay and Lesbian Free Zone”: On the Radical Dissents of Justice Scalia and Other (Post-) Queers.[Raising Questions about Lawrence, Sex Wars, and the Criminal Law]. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 94(3), 503-550.