Top Special Offer! Check discount
Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!
An explanation of the topic of globalization and international trade is provided through the article named “International Business” that is published on Wikipedia. It is a useful article since it provides a thorough overview of what international commerce is and the key aspects of how it is seen in various contexts. The lack of thematic specificity is one of the commentary’s most glaring flaws, but there are other flaws as well. Since the word ”international business” is wide and the article covers so much ground, it is not pertinent to a researcher with a focused interest in the field. The other weakness that is noted is the unnecessary generalization of crucial issues. The article appears to be a summary of a lot of issues, hence the justification for why the use of bullets is prone in many sections of the report. It thus means that a scholar who wants an elaboration on most of these summarized concepts would have to do further personal research to determine the understanding of what they desire to know. Lastly, it is affirmed that the study can be improved through the use of a concluding remark or abstract that generalizes the whole report. The article is extensive enough to warrant for the need for a conclusion, to sum up the findings by the authors and the trends that are apparent in international trade. Overall, therefore, the article can be improved through the use of a specific approach, more research, and conclusion to sum the findings.
The findings summarize that the article is informative, but it can be improved through various ways. One technique that can be used in developing the paper would be by the use of a more specific approach in carrying out the research. The decision for this suggestion was based on the assumption that people are more likely to relate to a research paper that targets a specific issue than that which is general. The recommendation was also based on the need to reduce the use of bullets. The decision to suggest for a more extensive research to avoid generalization is because people can associate bullet styles as blogs and thus ignore the content regardless of how informative it is as the case with the presented article. Lastly, the decision to recommend for a more in-depth coverage of the conclusion is that it would provide the reader with a summary of what they just read. The decision was made after it took time to even figure out what the researcher was talking about in the whole paper without success hence a weakness in describing a research paper. Overall, I felt enthusiastic to be in control of the research project because I was in a position to carry out a research process and make decisions that would improve my conceptualization of research papers in the future.
Hire one of our experts to create a completely original paper even in 3 hours!