Does Affirmative Action Advance Racial Equality

This paper addresses the issue of whether affirmative action promotes racial equality. No, the idea that affirmative action for minorities in society could harm its intended beneficiaries was raised as early as the 1960s, when affirmative action for minorities in the United States, as a term presented by the Kennedy administration, began to be adopted as a corporate and government strategy. Clarence Thomas publicly enunciated one of the long-contentious topics surrounding affirmative action policy against targeted communities in society long before he entered the Supreme Court in 1991. Mr. Thomas was not for the idea of the affirmative policy despite admitting being one of the beneficiaries from the same; he told a correspondent in 1982 in The New York Times in 1982.

Various researchers began alluding to this concept as a mismatch, hence not achieving its intended goal. Its governmental policy regarding minorities in society can hurt those it should assist by putting them at graduate school in which they fall under the average level of their capability and instead have a rough time  (Slater, Dan). As a result, the contention goes; the student suffers in their careers due to their placement in particular schools. Mismatch hypothesis does not assert that minority students ought not to go to elite colleges. However, it insinuates that minority students or otherwise do not specifically benefit by going to a school that they enroll with scholarly capabilities well below the average level of their schoolmates.

During the research period, researchers have been examining more carefully at how affirmative policy regarding minorities in the US runs practice. In light of how they analyze the statistic that has been gathered, some of these researchers have held the idea that affirmative policy regarding these groups in the US does not support the students it is projected to aid. Why? This is due to some minority students who get into the best school with the assistance of affirmative policy may be ideally be served by going to a less elite school to which they could get affirmation with to a lesser extent pride or no pride by any means

The statistics gathered from the research depicted that six hundred and nine of the estimated two thousand candidates got into their dream law school of their choice. Around seventy-five percent of those six hundred and nine registered at their preferred option. The rest of the quarter picked instead for their second choice school, mostly for geographic or financial reasons  (Slater, Dan). Looking at this data, of the six hundred and nine Africa-America candidates who got into their first choice, only five hundred and twelve went, and the remaining, one hundred and seventy-seven settled for their second-choice, probably a less prestigious college.

These statistics depicted a plausible chance to evaluate mismatch concept. Given the fact that only six hundred and nine Africa-American students got a placement on their first-choice graduate school implied that every one of the six hundred and nine was comparable in any event that one respect, however conceivably unique in numerous various ways  (Slater, Dan). Nonetheless, that mismatch concept held any water, at that point the one hundred and seventy-seven students who willingly decided on their second-choice graduate school and were consequently hypothetically well matched could be on averagely placed and have better results on the bar exam than their colleagues who picked the more top schools. Mr. Sander’s study of the B.P.S. information discovered that twenty-one percent of the Africa-America students who went to their second-choice schools fizzled the bar on their initial endeavor, contrasting with the thirty-four percent of the students who went to their first choice.

Work Cited

Slater, Dan. “Opinion | Does Affirmative Action Do What It Should?.” Nytimes.Com, 2017, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/opinion/sunday/does-affirmative-action-do-what-it-should.html.