Corruption Essay

Absence of a Framework for Running a Prison Organization:

A government servant intentionally breaking organizational rules is referred to as corruption. The amount of discretionary authority granted to correctional officers by the government determines the opportunities for corruption. The absence of a framework for running a prison organization serves as the primary inducement for corrupt behavior. (Braswell et al, 2017).

Elements That Undermine the Prison’s Formal Control System:

Sykes asserts that the following three elements undermine the prison’s formal control system:

Relationships that are mutually beneficial; friendships with prisoners; and defaults.

Forms of Discretionary Misconduct:

One of the most crucial components of any correctional system is the prison personnel. If I were a prisoner serving a term in a penal facility, I would attempt to obtain a reward from the staff in order to obtain additional privileges. Indeed, all forms of corruption are associated with improper use by civil servants. There are three forms of discretionary misconduct:

Misfeasance (accepting gratuities for special privileges);

Nonfeasance (omission of a proper act);

Malfeasance (trafficking and extortion);

The Challenging Nature of the Correction Profession:

The correction profession is one of the most challenging careers that exist today. The usual thing is to deal with some of the most difficult, cruel, and recalcitrant criminals locked outside the doors. Eventually, physical and sexual abuse is one of the parts in the work of prisoners (Braswell et al, 2017). Due to a shortage of personnel in some places, one correctional officer can be found working inside the corps with 100 prisoners under the maximum security level under his supervision. People make decisions and tend to be more or less honest about their different relationships. Thus, one part of ethics considers virtues, the development of character and helps us decide what kind of people we should be.

Creating an Ethical Prison:

As for “undeserving deserve”, over the past 35 years in reducing the humiliation and regressive effects of prison sentences, even the least deserving offenders should not be exposed to the violent environment that characterizes most high-security facilities. In an ethical prison, punishment will be required, but there will be the humanity of the perpetrators while peacekeeping will remind people that we are all connected in society (Snyder, 2002). Prisoners would be punished and treated more or less equally in this prison. In my ideal prison, I would create the system where all prisoners would not be harassed or abused for their past deeds. Eventually, in the case with 51-year-old prisoner, the state should release him to save the money and give him an opportunity get a healthcare. In any case, an ethical prison would have released him.

Considering the Consequences of Actions:

The unpredictable environment of the correctional institution affects every person in various ways. Those who work to provide care, custody, and control within the institution, consider each situation and circumstances in their own unique manner. Punishment is required, but we cannot lose sight of the humanity of the perpetrators. Peacekeeping reminds people that we are all connected, including the victim, the offender, and the public (Snyder, 2002). Utilitarianism encourages people to consider the consequences of actions.

Effective Supervision and Support:

Staff is the best resource of the correctional facility, therefore effective supervision and support of personnel who have direct contact with the population of prisoners is necessary. Personnel must have the authority delegated to them to perform assigned tasks within their abilities. The empowerment of employees is a primary approach to encouraging correctional workers to assess their workplaces (Garland, 2002). In addition, there is no place for chain gangs in an ethical prison. A prison guard can control only 20 unleashed men in a road crew. The only active chain gangs are in the Maricopa County jail in Arizona. In 1995, he was re-entered to Alabama to make imprisonment more stringent.

Treatment of Women Offenders:

Some argue that women offenders are treated differently than men. It used to be that they were usually sentenced to imprisonment more readily, given the prison conditions for smaller crimes or were deprived of their liberty after committing smaller crimes (Garland, 2002). However, I can conclude that it is beneficial for women to have other treatment. Women are different from men. Prison is in many ways more difficult - mental health problems caused by those who are separated from children are not the same as for men (Snyder, 2002).

Government vs Private Firms:

To the last question, supporters argue that private firms can do things more efficiently and less expensive than the government. Opponents say that the government can be effective; they simply need to adopt strategies that increase efficiency and effectiveness.

References

Braswell, M. C., McCarthy, B. R., & McCarthy, B. J. (2017). Justice, crime, and ethics. Taylor & Francis.

Garland, B. (2002). Prison treatment staff burnout: Consequences, causes, and prevention. Corrections Today, 64(7), 116-121.

Snyder, D. N. (2002). Recruitment and retention programs: Important during economic ups and downs. Corrections Today, 64(3), 92-96.