Top Special Offer! Check discount
Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!
Coca-Cola is a global company with the strongest commitment to its corporate social responsibility through encouraging sustainable development by delivery of social, economic, and environmental paybacks for its shareholders. The organizational corporate social responsibility is well catered by the company’s code of ethics that guides all the business engagements. The code of ethics compels the firm and its employees to show example and to pick up from knowledge. The corporation sets high standards for their people at all levels regarding their behavior and endeavor to achieve them consistently. The company’s practices and principles foster their strong, collaborative, and innovative practices that are attributed to transparency, accountability, and ethical behavior. Operations are guided by the company’s established standards of corporate governance and ethics. The reliance on their code of ethics has necessitated the company to continuously review its systems to achieve international best practices in relation to transparency and accountability. The corporate social responsibility of Coca-Cola is mainly based on the key pillars that form their code of ethics; honesty and integrity.
The code of ethics addresses the legal requirements as provided under the various legal systems in which the company operates. The Coca-Cola’s code of ethics complies fully with the legal mandates by encouraging activities that are within the law. The company works by prohibiting its employees from engaging in certain offences like corruption.
Non-compliance implies that the firm fails to adhere to the legal requirements and obligations in the country it operates. The most common implication for noncompliance with legal mandates is a fine. The US sentencing guidelines specify the conditions under which an organization can be fined and noncompliance is one of the situations that result in fines. The firm ought to ensure that it complies fully with all the legal requirements that are in place.
The legal or ethical safeguards ought to be in place to enhance ethical behavior among employees. The safeguards are fundamental in an organization because they take away the excuse that workers lack the understanding of particular information regarding their ethical responsibilities. The two major ethical safeguards that are present in Coca-Cola include ethics audits and code of conduct. A code of conduct addresses various issues affecting the organization for examples laws and regulations, company needs, as well as ethical issues. Internal ethical audits are also significant because they normally aim at uncovering the level of compliance among employees with the organizational code of ethics. The ethical audit utilizes several sources and auditors usually go over the information to ascertain if there is a need to implement certain changes. The sources of information for ethical audits include interviews, surveys, focus groups, documents, and direct observations. The audits are utilized to examine the design, execution, and effectiveness of the company’s ethical programs, objectives, as well as activities.
Through its code of ethics, Coca-Cola is dedicated to creating an ethical corporate ethos across its system. The company is also strictly committed to its principles to ensure that all its operations are within the legal guidelines in the region they operate. To make sure that all business is conducted with integrity and honesty; the key pillars of its code of ethics, the organizational starting point is to work in accordance with all the anti-corruption laws of the nations they operate. The firm’s code of business conduct functions as the pillar of its approach to compliance and ethics. The code states clearly Coca-Cola’s objectives of accountability in relation to ethical conduct in all sections of its business operations. The reading, understanding, and strict compliance to the company’s code of ethics is a key requirement for its employees and other stakeholders to ensure the full development of an ethical culture. Corruption is treated as a major offense that no employee or Coca-Cola’s stakeholders should engage in at any time or place. The incorporation of the anti-corruption program in the firm’s code of ethics has shaped the company’s culture which is characterized by zero tolerance for corruption. The organizational culture suggests that any form of corruption, for example, bribing or any other dealing, should not be tolerated at any particular time or engagement. The organizational code of business conduct as well as the anti-bribery policy acts as a guideline to encourage employees to operate with honesty and integrity. Generally, all the business operations of Coca-Cola are strictly guided by its code of ethics that has inspired the development of an ethical culture that does not encourage any kind of unlawful dealings.
The company’s culture also encourages free sharing of information among employees at all organizational levels. Ethical concerns are raised by employees when they feel that certain requirements have been breached. Since the organizational code of ethics encourages the unlimited sharing of important information, particularly on matters affecting the organization’s stakeholders, employees are encouraged to channel their ethical concerns through the various channels that have been provided. Employees have the autonomy to present their ethical concerns directly to the relevant persons and offices for relevant actions. The employees also have access to official contact addresses like phone numbers and email addresses through which they can pass the information. Besides, the organizational ethical culture requires promotes freedom of sharing information hence, employees are not victimized by sharing such information. Nonetheless, workers are only allowed to channel information they know is real and conformed.
The resources available to employees in Coca-Cola fall under different categories, for example, financial, workplace, and lifestyle. The workplace resources include the things that make working conditions favorable to all employees, such as the diverse and inclusive work environment, as well as training programs for workers. Another resource includes the quality-of-life benefits, for instance, paid holidays and vacation, in addition to local club discounts. Employees in Coca-Cola are also eligible to get a wide range of financial benefits, for example, motivation packages for achieving a particular objective like achieving the sales target. All employees have equal opportunities to get the resources.
The company offers several resources to its employees. However, the most preferred resources include the sponsored training programs and financial packages for workers. The training programs are designed to empower employees and prepare them to work in any other environment that requires competence.
Provided on a separate document.
Employees have a right to raise their concerns through whistle-blowing; however, it should only be done under certain conditions. A worker should only blow a whistle when he or she is sure that there is protection for the action. A whistle-blower is protected when the information he or she is revealing is right by making qualifying disclosure. Whistle-blowing should also be done when the information is being disclosed to the required individual, and in a correct approach to make it protected disclosure. The information that warrants whistle-blowing should also meet the categorization as criminal wrongdoings, miscarriage of justice, failure to conform with a permissible onus, harm to the environment, and dangers to the public’s health and safety.
The process of whistle-blowing includes certain steps that must be followed to achieve the desired outcome. The first step involves identification of the right person through which the concern should be raised. The person can be a line manager, the human resource manager, or any other individual depending on the nature of the issue being raised. The second step is to receive communication from the person you intend to raise the matter through by explaining how and when the concern will be dealt with, and whether the issue raised warrants whistle-blowing. The third step is to decide when an investigation about the issue is necessary. The significance of the issue is ascertained by conducting a background investigation to determine the authenticity of the information. The fourth step in the whistle-blowing process involves communication to explain the outcomes of the investigation. The issue is then raised through an independent body to reach the relevant persons.
Rewarding whistle-blowers encourages other employees to come forward with important information. Most workers could be facing several issues, but they are not willing to raise them. Whistleblower programs are significant because they result in enforcement activity. Whistle-blowers encourage the uncovering of important information that can help an organization to evade cases like fraud. The rewarding of whistle-blowers encourages people to reveal fundamental information or raise important matters that would not have been addressed if it were not for whistle-blowing programs. On the other hand, whistle-blowing might encourage reputational damage to the business, especially when the exposure happens in the public domain. When negative information of a company is exposed to the public, it risks its reputation and might affect the customer base. Paying whistle-blowers might also result in speculation of negative information which could also lead to costly legal proceedings. In addition, encouraging whistle-blowing might lead to disagreements between junior and senior employees.
The US sentencing guidelines specify the acts that can lead to serious legal consequences. Companies like Coca-Cola rely strictly on their code of ethics. One of the culpable acts that might lead to legal actions against an organization is engagement in corruption dealings. Because of the attributed consequences, the organization ensures that its employees do not engage in such acts.
The three culpability factors used to determine fines include offense category, organization size, and other factors like a history of noncompliance. The category of the offense is determined by considering the culpability of the company and the level of environmental damage caused by the offense. The size of an organization also determines the fine that an organization is given. The sizes range from micro to large depending on the scale of the firm. The history of noncompliance also affects the fine because a history of noncompliance influences a higher fine.
Hire one of our experts to create a completely original paper even in 3 hours!