Big Med by Atul Gawande and the draft

After reading the draft and the article Big Med by Atul Gawande, I believe that the introduction does not clearly identify and elaborate on the main argument, primary strategy, and target audience. The instructions stated that the main argument should be supported by examples from the article, and that the main argument should be stated clearly as the thesis statement in the introduction. As a result, you must ensure that your thesis incorporates the article’s primary argument in order to make it stronger. The strategy employed by the author and how effective it is to an audience of your choice but not the one intended by the author of the article. This brings me to another observation pertaining to the draft. The draft does not specify the audience or audiences as required and proves how effective the strategy could be to this audience.

Besides, link the juxtaposition rhetorical strategy used by the author in promoting the main argument in the article to one or more audiences of your choice. Analyze how effective this rhetorical strategy is in communicating the information to the audience that you selected. In fact, the draft paper has focused more on analyzing Gawande`s article instead of analyzing the main rhetorical strategy he used in promoting his argument as well as how effective it is to the audience that you selected. Otherwise, the draft is well written. It only needs these slight changes to make it perfect. Particular attention should be paid to forming the thesis from the main rhetorical strategy employed by the author and the analysis regarding how effective it is to the selected audience. Also, draw your arguments from the article.