Aristotle about sins

Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics

Aristotle defined virtues as mental characteristics that assist persons in living a good life. Furthermore, Aristotle believes that a good life is one that is lived for a reason. Moral and intellectual virtues are the two categories of virtues. Aristotle associates virtues with faculty, passion, and character qualities because they are aspects of the intellect. Developing character virtues requires making it a habit. Making the appropriate judgment and exercising virtuous behavior are both required. Being a virtuous person does not happen by chance; it requires careful consideration and choosing the proper route.

Focus on Virtues of Ethics

Virtue ethics emphasizes on desirable characteristics that a moral person exemplify as opposed to engaging in an activity or duty that results in good consequences. With virtues of ethics, a person focuses on choosing an inward behavior rather than depending on external laws. Aristotle argues that the character of a person determines his/her choices. For instance, possessing the virtue of ethics makes one moral. Every individual should focus on eudaimonia. One can attain eudaimonia by practicing virtues.

Kantian Deontology

Conversely, Kantian deontology emphasizes on adhering to ethical duties. According to Kant, morality does not rely on the consequences of a person’s actions. You can judge a moral agent by the motive of his/her actions and not the outcome of his/her character.

Utilitarianism and the Consequences

With utilitarianism, the right choice of action is one that results in more beneficial consequences over evil acts. Besides, you can justify an evil act if the consequence produces the greatest happiness.

Virtue Ethics and Personal Life

Regarding my personal life, the virtue ethics I possess brings happiness to me and the society. Virtue ethics focuses on the importance of a person, motives, and conscience. Conversely, since utilitarianism stresses on actions that bring greatest happiness, one can lie to make more people happy, which is wrong. A deontologist will argue that it is always wrong to lie regardless of the outcome.