Application of Virtue Ethics in Threatening E-mail with Ransom

1. Sheila was fond of taking photographs with friends.

2. She used to go out with them and click some photographs on a daily basis.

3. She was also habitual of uploading the photos on social media sites.

4. John and Sheila were studying at the same school.

5. They were once encouraged to take a psychological test that aimed to determine user engagement with social media.

6. They packed their bags and rushed to the class to know more about the test.

7. The social contradict theory is applicable to this case.

For each principle, motivate whether or it is applicable to the case study

1. Public

Sheila should always act nicely in order to keep the attention of the public intact.

2. Client and employer

Sheila may have to act in a way that her teacher, classmates, and other people like and appreciate the most.

3. Product

Sheila needs to ensure that the quality of her products is great.

4. Judgment

She is required to judge things based on their long-term effects and may have to maintain independence and integrity in her judgments.

5. Management

Sheila needs to collaborate with her fellows, especially with John, in order to promote ethical approaches to the development, management, and maintenance of the program.

6. Profession

She needs to act professionally in all situations and should prepare herself for a challenging tomorrow.

7. Colleagues

Sheila should be fair and supportive to all of her mates.

8. Self

She will have to participate in a variety of learning programs to boost her performance.

List clauses that are applicable to the case study and explain why for each

Clause #

Motivation

1.04

Disclose the dangers to her friends.

1.01

Accept the responsibility of her negative social media activities.

3.01

She should strive for perfection.

1.08

Sheila needs to contribute to the public education.

Case Study worksheet for Threatening Email with Ransom

 Key ideas or concepts from the case study

1. Dr. Almstrum has found a piece of spam.

2. He found it associated with an email while moderating a Yahoo group.

3. The email stated that I have a bad news for you.

4. The virtue ethics theory can be applied to this case.

5. It told Dr. Almstrum that the software of the router had a vulnerability, which needed to be checked as soon as possible.

For each principle, motivate whether or it is applicable to the case study

1. Public

Dr. Almstrum will be required to pay attention to the vulnerability in order to maintain the public interest.

2. Client and employer

His clients should not be given instant access to emails that contain viruses and malware.

3. Product

The quality of services needs to be improved.

4. Judgment

Judgments should be made if the problem is of a serious nature.

5. Management

The various versions and divisions of emails should be managed, and their errors should be fixed.

6. Profession

Dr. Almstrum needs to show professionalism at every stage of work.

7. Colleagues

His colleagues should be allowed to test different versions of the same email.

8. Self

Dr. Almstrum may have to gain more knowledge for personal and professional grooming.

List clauses that are applicable to the case study and explain why for each

Clause #

Motivation

1.06

Deceptive individuals.

4.05

Conflicts may arise during the job.

6.02

Dr. Almstrum has to provide valuable information.

Case Study worksheet for Al, Death, and Mourning

Key ideas or concepts from the case study

1. Technology impacts our lives in a lot of ways.

2. The sadness is created when people respond to technology negatively or aggressively.

3. Ahmad works on his own griefbot, a project that helps him respond to a personal loss.

4. Ahmad has a 2-year-old daughter.

5. He continues working hard.

6. The theory of Kantianism is applied to this case to come up with clauses.

For each principle, motivate whether or it is applicable to the case study

1. Public

The public interest exists where the project of Ahmad has to be launched.

2. Client and employer

A confidence level needs to be maintained between his clients.

3. Product

The success of griefbot depends on how it is introduced to the audience.

4. Judgment

Judgments should always be based on the consistency of the project.

5. Management

Ahmad needs to learn great interpersonal and communication skills, as well as management skills.

6. Profession

He should take the profession seriously.

7. Colleagues

His colleagues may show their interest in the project.

8. Self

He should focus on personal grooming.

List clauses that are applicable to the case study and explain why for each

Clause #

Motivation

1.04

Risks involved in the project.

4.05

Conflicts of interest.

Case Study worksheet for Software Design Testing

Key ideas or concepts from the case study

1. Sven is a successful software engineer.

2. Sven works at Superior Systems, a famous software company that designs specialized software.

3. Sven’s clients are always eager to use the products.

4. The ethical framework used here is virtue ethics.

For each principle, motivate whether or it is applicable to the case study

1. Public

The software engineer has to act smartly and needs to work for the public interest.

2. Client and employer

Sven will have to act professionally and should take clients’ likes and dislikes into consideration.

3. Product

Sven needs to improve the quality of software.

4. Judgment

Sven needs to judge the quality of software from a client’s perspective.

5. Management

He should collaborate with other workers of the company and needs to promote ethical approaches to the development, and marketing of software.

6. Profession

Sven has to work for the betterment of the company and should show sincerity at every stage.

7. Colleagues

Sven will have to be supportive of all other employees.

8. Self

He should regularly participate in lifelong learning programs.

List clauses that are applicable to the case study and explain why for each

Clause #

Motivation

3.01

Strive for excellence.

1.01

Accept the challenges and responsibility of his work.