Top Special Offer! Check discount
Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!
Causation refers to the causal relationship that exists between a specific act and its outcome, which is often an accident, through the provision of a means of communication. It can also be described as the behavior that resulted in a certain outcome by combining a certain state of mind in order to represent guilt elements. Positive discrimination is also known as affirmative action, which is a program that guarantees that poor persons get preferential benefits in education and jobs without discrimination based on their gender, ethnicity, or nationality (Baumeister 23). Despite the policy’s greatness of offering an even field of opportunities, it completely disregards the prerequisite aspect of the things. The strategy usually focuses on giving the minority group some support with an aim of upraising them; however, as it has been evident, these steps could cause more harm, as compared to the advantages.
People who are covered by the policy are usually subjected to the unfair advantages over those who have the better qualifications aspects when applying for a job or an enrollment in the institutions of the higher education. It is usually witnessed in the college applications, whereby most of the students are required to fill out a question about their race. A leading institution of the higher education establishment usually desires to appear as a well-rounded facility through choosing the student’s admission on the basis of their race or the nationality and not their qualification or the higher a GPA in school. It is not fair to those students who work extra hard to attain the outstanding result and later being turned down since they are not part of the minority group.
Therefore, people who are viewed as the minority through considering their skin color as well as the nationality instead of their qualifications, may have the limiting or the short-term benefits in a certain career or experience in the college (Feagin 13). For instance, the Simpsons episode talks about Bart who was accepted in a smart class by being considered a minority in their society which overwhelmed him since he was not prepared for the opportunity like that. He did not only become mentally inundated, but has also been socially and emotionally affected since he did not fit in the smart kids’ class, thus causing him to rug behind in the terms of his studies.
A long-simmering opposition to positive discrimination was publically articulated by Clarence Thomas several years before 1991 when he had a chance to serve on the Supreme Court. He strongly objected the affirmative action idea despite being a beneficiary, whereby he told a reporter from a popular press group that the practice usually subjected the students to the programs beyond their capabilities (Levin 18). Scholars have started referring to the program as a mismatch since the idea harms the qualified person through replacing them with the below average people who have a hard time in catching up with the system. The student tends to suffer later on in his/her career, though the mismatch speculation does not discourage the admission of the minority students to the elite institutions. Positive discrimination seems to be a wonderful idea but it is not fair in the system, since giving someone the advantages they are not qualified for can result in a ripple effect. It can thus subject them into the mediocre employees or students since they land into the spectacular opportunities without considering the hard work they have towards the career.
Positive discrimination does not usually guarantee identical results in either career or institutional opportunities offered but rather create numerous chances through considering the minority groups. It aims at creating equal chances for both the qualified and minority people in the society rather than only involving the bigger groups in institutions admission or job opportunities. The idea offers a boost to the minority groups with an overall benefit, whereby a higher incorporation of the practice can lead to better future representation in the workforce. American Civil Liberty Union states that in the labor force, about 48% consists of white men who have the college education who hold around 96% of chief executive officers, 86% are in the law firm enterprises, 85% are in tenured institution faculties, while 90% venture in media associations (Feagin 45).
The colored population makes around 36% of the overall task force; thus, affirmative action can be very useful in ensuring an equitable distribution of the job opportunities by eliminating the racial discrimination in the career industry (Feagin 46). Despite the various objections arising from the idea, it has remained functional through a system, which ensures that people from the non-minority groups are considered when a job offering arises; however, at the same time, much of the focus is placed on the minority population through choosing them on a regular basis when such sorts of the opportunities arise. Positive discrimination also helps in diversifying the institutions of higher learning as well as the career industry, since an experience in college enriches an individual’s exposure to different cultural, economic, and social backgrounds.
Affirmative action does not need compelling from state coercion or interference with equality in the law, since one can overcome unjust inequality forms in the society. However, it is not considered as the best method of dealing with unjust inequality, because according to evidence, the schemes usually hurt the people who are intended to benefit from the program. These led to an effective utilization of the program in Texas through a Supreme Court ruling which had two provisions, whereby any student finishing among the top 10% would secure a chance to join a publically financed university as well as allowing higher learning institutions to consider diversity and race when they enrolled students (Miller 57). Through these ideas, assuring spaces to relatively high achieving students means that some effects regarding the school quality are eliminated. By allowing the authorities to consider the race of students, it would eliminate deprivation experienced exclusively by the colored students. The affirmative action seems to be unequal, because receiving good grades in a tough inner city is usually more difficult, as when compared to the highly selective institutions even with the proper parental guidance.
People living in racial discriminative societies also have difficulties past their universal social deprivation which might make them attain lower grades despite being evenly talented students. By using positive discrimination, the institutions do not consider a worse start of the majority students even with higher grades, since it focuses on helping the students from the minority groups in the society. In Michigan University, there was a system which granted 20 free points out of the required 100 points to the despised ethnic minorities, which were considered unconstitutional, though, during its reign, it was freely chosen by the institution (Feagin 78). The libertarians would consider the scheme as an admirable voluntary project which attempts to equally ensure free association if only it chose students freely, and as a result, the scheme became terminated. Therefore, it is evident that affirmative action aims at providing equal opportunities regardless of the racial affiliations, which, in turn, could result in undesired outcomes when the intended person fails to meet the expectations.
Baumeister, Roy F. Social Psychology and Human Nature. Wadsworth, 2017.
Feagin, Joe R. Discrimination American Style: Institutional Racism and Sexism. R.E. Krieger Pub. Co., 2015.
Levin, Jack. The Violence of Hate: Understanding Harmful Forms of Bias and Bigotry. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.
Miller, Darla F. Positive Child Guidance. Wadsworth Publishing Co., 2012.
Hire one of our experts to create a completely original paper even in 3 hours!