Top Special Offer! Check discount
Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!
This rubric takes into account the learning requirements and objectives to identify the winners of the science fair project on life sciences and health. The judges will use their professional expertise to assess which students best match the rubric standards. However, because the judge’s verdict is final, only a few winners emerge. As a result, every student should be proud of their efforts.
The combination of life science and health is a recurring theme. The material is timely and relevant, and it provides practical solutions to real-world problems. The topic has a definite purpose
The topic has an indefinite purpose
The theme has no relation to life science and health. It does not solve any problem
__/10
Hypothesis
The problem is evocative and well researched. Its hypothesis is concisely stated in the “I think….then…” format
Hypothesis is just sufficiently developed and reported
It is somewhat expanded and partially stated
The hypothesis is not stated at all. The research is unclear
__/15
Background research
The study is comprehensive, where its ideas are concisely deliberated. It includes examples of health integration
It is many particulars with some examples of life science integration with health
Has some specifics with no integration examples. The students do not address all thoughts.
The research has neither particulars nor examples. It has unexplained ideas
__/20
Experimental design
The procedure is detailed and steps listed in a sequential manner. All materials are highlighted and safety precautions addressed
The procedure is sketchy. Steps and materials are highlighted. Safety precautions are not deliberated
The method is ambiguous and steps not. There exist few materials with no safety measures therein
Method is empty with neither materials nor safety measures explained
__/20
Data collection
There is a proper use of collection techniques. The methods are related to the project and appropriate trials used
Use of collection techniques with the proper use of trials
Use of irrelevant collection methods with inappropriate use of scientific tests as well
No data collecting methodology is used. No trials are executed
Analysis
Conclusions are data supportive. There is an explanation of the rejection or acceptance of the hypothesis
Conclusions are data based, but there is an unclear reason why the hypothesis was overruled
Conclusions are slightly related to data. No reasons why the hypothesis was accepted or rejected
Conclusions are not data supportive. No reports about the hypothesis
__/20
Conclusion
A logical conclusion for the integration with health is drawn. It answers the hypothetical question with a real-world application
Only a logical conclusion of the project is made with partial explanation on the hypothesis
A reasonable conclusion from the data is made
Draws neither the conclusions nor answers the hypothesis
__/15
TOTAL
____/100
Judges’ comments
Hire one of our experts to create a completely original paper even in 3 hours!